The relationships they had enough time and enough honesty to build correctly.
Every person I’ve watched operate at the top of the wealth spectrum who seemed genuinely content — not performed contentment, not the managed presentation of a life well lived, but the actual ease of someone who has figured out something important — shared a specific characteristic.
They had people around them who knew them before the money and stayed because of the person rather than the position. A marriage or partnership that was built on the actual human being rather than the principal. A friendship network small enough to be genuine and old enough to be tested. In some cases, a creative or intellectual obsession that existed entirely outside the enterprise — something that demanded of them without rewarding them financially, and that therefore remained uncontaminated by the performance requirements of their professional life.
None of this was correlated with the size of the fortune. I have watched people with net worths in the hundreds of millions who were structurally miserable — trapped in enterprises they no longer cared about, surrounded by people whose primary loyalty was to the wealth rather than the person — and people with comparable wealth who seemed, in the most specific and non-performative sense, free.
The difference was not money. It was never money past a certain threshold.
It was the quality of the relationships that the money had either protected or destroyed. Because money is remarkably effective at doing both, and the direction it takes depends almost entirely on the deliberateness with which the person at the centre manages the boundary between the principal and the person.
The happiest people I know at this level spent their fortune on experiences and time with people they love and almost nothing else.
The jet was how they got there faster.
The destination was always the people.
